One login, one workflow
Create a task, start a timer, mark it billable. No second app, no copy-pasting hours between systems.
Comparison
Tideflow vs Harvest + Asana: one workspace instead of two subscriptions
Asana for tasks. Harvest for time. It's a common pairing — and it works, until you need to know whether a project actually made money. Here's how running both compares to a single connected workspace.
The two-tool problem
Individually excellent. Together, still missing the margin.
Asana is one of the best general task managers available, and Harvest is a solid, focused time tracker. The gap isn't in either tool — it's between them. Time tracked in Harvest doesn't know what task it was for in Asana's sense of scope and status, and neither tool calculates what that time actually cost versus what it billed.
What you need
Harvest + Asana
Tideflow
Task and project management
Asana handles this well — boards, lists, timelines.
Yes — tasks, boards, lists, calendar, and timelines, scoped to client work.
Time tracking
Harvest handles this well, via its own app or browser extension.
Built in — one-click task timers and manual entries, no extension needed.
Keeping tasks and time in sync
Requires a Harvest–Asana integration, or manual reconciliation.
Time is logged directly against the task — nothing to sync.
Cost rate vs billing rate
Harvest supports billing rates; cost rates and margin require a separate report or spreadsheet.
Cost and billing rates cascade from account to client to project to task automatically.
Live project profitability
Not available across both tools without manual exports.
Revenue, cost, and margin update automatically as time is logged.
Monthly cost
Two subscriptions, two invoices, two admin panels.
One subscription covers tasks, time, and profitability.
What you get back
Margin without the spreadsheet
Every logged hour already carries a cost rate and billing rate, so project margin updates itself.
One bill instead of two
A single subscription replaces the cost of running a task tool and a time tracker side by side.
Frequently asked questions
Tideflow vs Harvest + Asana FAQs
Why would I replace Harvest and Asana with one tool?
Harvest and Asana are both well-built tools individually, but running them together means your time data lives in one system and your task data in another. Reconciling the two — to answer "was this project profitable?" — usually means a manual export and a spreadsheet. Tideflow keeps tasks and time in the same place so the financial picture stays current automatically.
Does Harvest already show project profitability?
Harvest can show billable vs non-billable hours and a cost-rate-based profitability report, but it only knows about time tracked in Harvest itself — it has no visibility into the task workflow, scope, or status driving that time. Tideflow connects the two directly.
Is switching from two tools to one disruptive?
Less than most teams expect. The core habits — create a task, start a timer, mark time billable — map closely to what teams already do in Asana and Harvest. The difference is what happens after: margin updates without extra work.
What if I only want to replace one of the two tools?
That works too. Some teams start by moving time tracking into Tideflow while keeping their existing task tool, then migrate fully once they see the profitability data. Tideflow is built to stand alone, but it doesn't require an all-or-nothing switch on day one.
Related reading
Keep exploring
See it for yourself
Stop reconciling two tools to find your margin.
Tideflow is in early access for agencies and freelancers who bill by the hour. Request access and we'll be in touch personally.